If there’s one thing that annoys me more than anything else
when I’m reading, it is the climax that flaps about like a fish out of water
and then a ‘so what’ ending. I feel particularly disgruntled when I have
spent many hours patiently reading (page by page and sentence by sentence) a
book that seemed to promise a breath-taking climax, only to find the writer
chickened out and produced a wet
firework instead of an explosive high point.
Endings and climaxes are two different things, I do realise,
but they should both produce a feeling of satisfaction if the reader is to feel
the story was worth reading. In thriller
writing the climax is the point at which you should feel excited (read
thrilled) and can’t wait to see how it all comes out! Perhaps you should even feel like your on the high point of a roller coaster...
In thrillers, one of the best (and most used) climaxes is
when someone’s life is threatened or someone is about to be killed and the hero
finally succeeds and overcomes the threats. Building up to this point in a
proper believable way needs to be appropriately handled according to the story.
The ending is somewhat down river of this high point but it
too should produce a feeling of satisfaction that all has turned out as it
should. The ending should also fulfil and answer the original story question
posed at the beginning of the book. All loose ends need to be tied up as you approach this part and the reader should know it is the end of the story. Not turning the
last page to see if there is any more…
So are your scenes properly built up so the reader is
thrilled/excited? Are your endings rewarding the reader? Do you agree that this is important?